Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
She also assumes that Chris is not supporting her and trying to undercut her. She also believes that Kelly does not want to try anything new. Cliff- Fully understand that he needs to reduce the cost of the budget, which may cost him more employees. He also realizes this must be done by the August deadline and assumes that his top management will work together, and make critical decisions to meet the deadline.
Chris- Is a lot like Kelly and assumes that the August deadline will be hard to meet. Chris also assumes that Kelly and Pat can work through the detail without other resources.
Explain the arguments made by each of these people. The current marketed product has not had any growth, and does not show any real potential of growth. The revenue and economic conditions are not ideal at this time and not promised to make a profit.
As per Pat and Chris they state that another source is in the process to developing some type to retail application. It is only a matter of time before the other company will have their product out on the market which will be the competition.
With this being said the deadline for August has been set in stone. This deadline is based on reaction to the other product since no one really knows the actual release date.
Pat Lambert is looking at things from marketing prospectivePat is familiar with what the company needs and realizes they need to find a new product to increase the revenue. She realizes how important it is for Cancan to have a great prototype by August, this will beat the competitor ND Cancan will be able to establish a better position with their current customers as well as future clients.
Pat also realizes that this prototype needs to be delivered effectively so that they can remain the leader in services, but knows that all the features may not be available when it is delivered to the market. Kelly Thomas communicates with his team that the project they are aiming for is impossible.
When all the figures are placed down on paper Kelly is not sure and is not comfortable committing to an August deadline. Kelly feels that there are too many changes that deed to take place by the deadline and that the features that are being proposed needs to be reduced.
Chris Martinis sees the new proposed product as the future face of the company. As the Vice president of product development he knows that the company needs a new product to increase revenue. This will also give the upper hand on the competition. Chris does realize that the turnaround time is a ere small window when you need to research, developand market a product.
He is on board with Pat that they may have to deliver the product without all the features. Evaluate each argument listed above as sound or unsound and why.
Indicate Nether they are emotional or logical in nature. The emotional argument has been encouraged by the position of the company and the markets current economic state.
He is basing his argument on that the competitor will have a new product soon and they need to have something before then. Pat Lambert argument is based on logic. As the head of marketing he understands the market the best.
He knows what is needed and what it will cost the company by proposing such changes. Kelly Thomas argument appears to be emotional.
From what was presented he feels that the others are going around him and trying to undercut him. He also feels like he is loosing power. Chris Martinis arguments appear to be emotional as well. He is basing his argument on experience as the vice president and also understanding of the market and the limited product that is being offered.
Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them. There were a couple different fallacious arguments that were within this company. Those that are vested in the new product are Chris, Pat, and Cliff. Cliff the CEO has given directions to the others to expand a new product to put out on the market.
There are some in the company who are thinking more like Kelly and believe that Cancan does not have a quality product to release to the market. Cliff also wants to know how Cancan can undid the new product.
Describe all problems in this situation. What appears to be the largest issue is the deadline that has been set to produce the new product.Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study GEN/ July 21, Professor Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study Part 1: Analysis 1.
Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study. a. Kelly- Through communication and emails Kelly assumes that the August deadline was impossible. He also assumes he is being cut .
GEN Critical thinking case. A case study for a manufacturing company called AcuScan, Inc was fulfilled. The case study involves “Operation Optimize” which plans to bring a new retail iScanner to the market.
Click here to get an A+ paper at a Discount Critical Thinking Case Study Case Study Assignment ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW Prepare a report for the CEO of AcuScan about the situation described in the GEN Critical Thinking Case Study.
Your report should include the following two parts: 1. Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study GEN/ July 21, Professor Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study Part 1: Analysis 1.
Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study.a. Kelly- Through communication and emails Kelly .
Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study Words | 7 Pages a report for the CEO about this situation in two parts: Part One: Respond to the specific questions .
Pacific brands case for critical thinking Introduction Pacific brands are the largest manufacturer and supplier of essential brands in New Zealand and Australian. The brands the company deals with include Holeproof, Bonds, Kayser, Sheridan, Hard Yakka, Berlei, and uniforms for firefighters'.